He said that religious language is rooted in the language of mythology, and said that myths are ways of trying to explain something through the use of storytelling - a fictional story conveying an objective truth.
God being all loving and allowing suffering for example.
Ayer, states that something cannot be held to be true until it can be scientifically verified. But there are tonnes of religious philosophers Flew presented an analogy of the jungle. The situation is meaningful even though it is fictitious and unverifiable.
However it is possible for something to be meaningful but unverifiable. It is quite possible for a statement to be meaningful without being verifiable. Ayer suggested a procedure for deciding whether a statement is verifiable. Is the cat dead or alive- you cannot know.
But do these myths truly convey objective truths?
Phillips plainly states that because the definitions are different, you cannot be a part of both. However, strong verification has been widely criticised for excluding many areas of knowledge. He argues that the verification principle would state that all polar bears are white, therefore non-white objects cannot be polar bears.
He criticised univocal and equivocal language: As a reductionist, Phillips aims to reduce everything down to the simplest possible explanation. This is best highlighted with the analogy of a baker and bread. Just as they cannot verify whether a gardener has been at work, the existence or nature of God might be beyond our normal methods of verification.
He said that symbols are something that we can all participate in, citing a flag as an example - we participate in the feeling of unity surrounding certain national flags.
Weak verification refers to statements that can be shown to be probable by observation and experience. Therefore the nature of God is a matter that is outside the scope of traditional methods of scientific enquiry.
He suggested that religion is not meaningless because its truth is verifiable in principle, thus meeting the conditions of verificationism. He also argued for the similarity of relation, which is basically the use of analogy; shepherds look after sheep just like God looks after us.
This way we can find true meaning in myths, which makes religious language meaningful.Explain the verification principle and the challenges (consider whether Ayer’s response to the verification principle is sufficient) – Explain the falsification principle and challenges.
The Verification Principle was founded by the logical positivist movement which was highly supported by the philosophical group the Vienna Circle.
Verification Principle is nice and easy, it follows on from Work you may have done in Ethics concerning Ayer and Emotivism or Hare on Prescriptivism (not much between them to be honest). Verification Principle was developed by Logical Positivists working a group called The Vienna Circle.
- The Verification Principle I would like to start this essay by explaining the background to Logical Positivism and the Verification Principle. The Verification Principle is a philosophical doctrine fundamental to Logical Positivism.
The Verification Principle Offers No Re Essay “The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief” Discuss Verification is a philosophical theory about the nature of language and meaning that was popular in the first half of the twentieth century.
It maintains that for a statement to be meaningful it has to. Verifying the verification principle (killarney10mile.comlosophy) submitted 3 years ago by DragonHunting Doing an essay for philosophy and one of the criticisms of A.J.
Ayer's verification principle is that it is in itself unverifiable. “The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief.” Discuss  The verification principle is a significant concept used by many philosophers in order to determine whether a religious statement is meaningful or not.Download