An internal memorandum written in recommended that Ford should wait to do this until when the government was expected to introduce fuel tank standards none existed in Ford decided, however, not to change the position of the gas tank primarily in order to reduce production costs.
Ford had the responsibility of providing its customers with the best safety features when using its automobiles.
Therefore, Ford did give equal consideration to the interests of each affected party. The memo estimated that by waiting until the Company could save According to egoism, Ford officials are only obliged to do whatever best promotes their own interests. If not, why not? In Ford ordered a recall of nearly 2 million vehicles.
Consequently, customers own the rights to expect the vehicles to function accordingly. Notes Case study from the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl. In the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration claimed that a safety defect existed in Pintos manufactured from to Cost-benefit analysis is a legitimate tool, which determines the best course of action by comparing the costs and benefits generated through a particular situation.
Did the Ford engineers involved in designing and testing the Pinto, who were aware of the problems associated with the placement of the gas tank behind the rear axle, fail to meet their ethical responsibilities by not taking steps to bring these problems to the attention of the public?
Although the Pinto passed the NHTSA test, Ford officials knew that the Pinto was prone to catch fire when struck from the rear, even in low-speed collisions, thus it was unsafe to drive the car without any technical improvements implemented.
From the perspective of utilitarianism, the morally right action is the one that provides the most happiness for all those affected. Between and plaintiffs brought about 50 lawsuits against Ford in connection with Pinto rear end collisions. By putting the NHTSA figures together with other statistical studies, Ford established a cost-benefit analysis involving both the interests of the consumers and the company itself.
Mounted in this position, the tank was punctured during tests by projecting bolts when hit from the rear at 20 NIPH.The decades since the Pinto case have allowed us to dissect Ford’s decision-making process and apply the latest behavioral ethics theory to.
We will write a custom essay sample on A Utilitarian Argument in the Ford Pinto Case specifically for you New York NY. McGraw-Hill, Boyce, Daniel “The Flaw of Utlitarianism: The Ford Pinto Case” Business Ethics IB. 15 April, Web.
11 April How to cite this page Ford and Toyota Case Study ; Ford Motor Company Case. Ethics Ford Pinto Case Study Discussion and Executive Summary This paper explores “The Ford Pinto Case” managing of business ethics.
Numerous factors suggest within this research that Ford Motor Company was negligent and violated its code of ethics%(26).
The Ford Pinto case is mentioned in most Business Ethics texts as an example of Cost-Benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified.
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to.
Ethical Theories Applicable To Ford Pinto Case Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this.
In relations to Ford Pinto, the case study shows that is was about an accident which took place involving a Ford Pinto and a Chevrolet Van which hit the Ford Pinto from behind.
The Pinto was being driven by an 18 years old Judy Ann Ulrich accompanies .Download